Connect with us


Boston Celtics: What point guards should Cs target this off-season?

Boston Celtics are likely to part ways with their former All-Star point guard Kemba Walker. After his chronic knee injury cost them multiple wins this season to move up in the Eastern Conference standings, on top of him showing he just does not fit behind two scoring wings, it was to be expected Walker would be on the move this off-season. With that said, Walker is likely to net in return Al Horford from the Thunder which begs the question, who will replace Kemba?



Photo: Shutterstock

Boston Celtics are likely to part ways with their former All-Star point guard Kemba Walker. After his chronic knee injury cost them multiple wins this season to move up in the Eastern Conference standings, on top of him showing he just does not fit behind two scoring wings, it was to be expected Walker would be on the move this off-season. With that said, Walker is likely to net in return Al Horford from the Thunder which begs the question, who will replace Kemba?

In this article, I am going to throw out a multitude of names that could be suitors to take up the reigns of starting point guard on the Celtics, but I am also going to rule out a few popular suggestions. Let’s get started with who the Cs should target.

Mike Conley is the absolute best-case scenario for the Celtics if Kemba Walker is dealt and they do not net a point guard in return. After having one of the worst seasons of his career, Conley bounced back and returned to what the Jazz traded for.

He averaged 16 points and 6 assists with just 1.9 turnovers per game. Conley was tremendous off the ball as a shooter, hitting 40.6% of his 128 catch and shoot threes. He was one of the best facilitators in the league and was masterful in pick and roll with Rudy Gobert and Derrick Favors, ranking 85th percentile as a pick and roll ball handler.

Even at 6’1, he is a positive defender that excels at navigating screens and making plays off the ball with his quick hands. At 33 years old and starting to pick up more and more injuries, it’s unlikely Conley receives max money in free agency but it will cost a significant amount to retain him. If the Boston Celtics were to get a meeting with Conley and his camp, I would expect Stevens to offer him a 2 year $50 million deal.

However, it’s unlikely the Celtics free up this kind of space, and even more unlikely Conley sets up meetings, seeing as he is likely to return to the Jazz.

Patty Mills should be at the top of the Boston Celtics’ list of priorities in free agency. He’s one of the most realistic free agents on the market for the Cs and he offers exactly what the Celtics need. He’s been in the league for 11 years now and has made a name for himself as one of the best shooting and off-ball point guards in the league.

He has one of the fastest triggers in the league and is an expert at moving between screens and coming off of pin downs with speed and balance. He’s not the passer the Celtics could hope for, but his movement off the ball and ball handling would be of great use to the Celtics’ stagnant offense. He’s 32 and is currently making around $12 million.

I estimate the Boston Celtics could offer him around 2 years $16 million and he would take it. They’d be using the full MLE but it would be well worth it seeing as they’d be bolstering their depth as well as bringing in some much-needed shooting.

The last option to take Walker’s place as the Celtics point guard is Lonzo Ball, but there’s a reason he’s last. Ball would bring some much-needed passing to the C’s backcourt while also providing some high-level defense at the guard position. He’s not undersized and he isn’t a ball-dominant scorer.

The eldest Ball brother can fling the ball all over the court and help get the Boston Celtics back to their ball movement-player movement-centric offense. He’s still got a little ways to go in terms of improving his shooting form and scoring, but with the Cs developmental staff, there is not a doubt in my mind that they couldn’t unlock his full shooting potential within a season.

However, with all that said Lonzo Ball is a restricted free agent, which means the Celtics could not just sign him outright unless they outbid everyone looking at him. And seeing as there are a lot of teams looking at him, that is extremely unlikely. The Boston Celtics would have to give up some serious assets to net Ball, on top of having to pay him more than they might like.

Reports say Ball is looking for a deal in the neighborhood of $20 million for multiple seasons. Being a former #2 overall pick who’s shown tons of promise his past three seasons, this price tag is understandable but it makes the chances of the Cs landing him extremely slim.

Not only would they have to find a way to come up with that kind of cap space, but they would also forfeit their chances of bringing back Marcus Smart the next off-season since he is likely to pursue the same deal. As palatable as a Smart and Ball backcourt may sound, it’s not nearly worth paying $40 million for. The only way I see the Cs moving for Ball is if they move Smart in another deal to net a star, which as I have said before, is unlikely.

Heading off the list of who the Boston Celtics should not target is Dennis Schroder. Much like Lonzo Ball, Schroder will be looking to secure a multi-year $20 million bag this off-season which the Celtics should not even consider paying. He’s one of the best bench creators in the league that can shoot and finish at the rim as well as defends his position at a high level.

However, he is not the passer that the Celtics need and his skill set is not what the Cs are missing. There is more than enough creation to go around between Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown, Schroder will more than likely stunt their offense or his own if he was to come to Bean Town.

The second biggest no-no amongst point guards hitting free agency this off-season is Elfrid Payton. He has been a punching bag for Knicks fans all season and for good reason. He is not only a bad scorer but a detrimental one that ruins the flow of the offense.

He would bring the passing that Boston covets and his defense would be a plus but both pale in comparison to how bad of a scorer he is. The Boston Celtics want to be a competitive playoff team, to do that they’ll need guys that can be respected in the halfcourt come playoff time. Payton is not one of those guys.

He is a poor shooter, hitting just 28.6% of his 3s and shooting 37% from midrange as well as being one of the worst finishing guards in the league, shooting 56% at the rim. Teams will lay off Payton in favor of guarding Jaylen Brown or Jayson Tatum which will create a rift in the half-court that Payton won’t be able to bridge. He is not the guard the Cs want leading their offense.

There is a multitude of other options out there, but these are the guys I expect Boston to be in the mix for and the guys that I expect they will look to avoid. Mike Conley will likely stay in Utah and Lonzo Ball will likely end up in a place that can afford him, which leaves Patty Mills as the most realistic candidate to replace Kemba Walker.

Underwhelming? Yes, but take that statement with a grain of salt. Patty Mills won’t be replacing Kemba Walker in a literal sense; that would be Marcus Smart. Rather, Mills will come off the bench and play a similar role Payton Pritchard played last season. Don’t worry, Pritchard is not going to be cut from the rotation as he and Mills will continue to alternate between point guard and shooting guard like the Celtics did this season with Walker, Smart, and Pritchard.


Gronk Presents A Dilemma For The Top 50 Patriots List

Is Rob Gronkowski the greatest tight end in NFL history?



Photo: Shutterstock

Is Rob Gronkowski the greatest tight end in NFL history? Probably. In a 10-year NFL career, he’s caught 566 passes for 8,484 yards with 86 touchdowns. Add in the playoffs, where he’s got another 89 catches in 20 games for 1,273 yards and 14 more touchdowns.

Then add in the four All-Pro honors and the three Super Bowl rings (one in Tampa). And the fact he blocked like an extra offensive lineman, played hurt and was revered by teammates for his goofy authenticity?

It’s probably more than “probably” that he’s the best there’s ever been at the spot. It’s a fact.

A full-go Gronk in SB46 against the Giants? Any Gronk in the 2013 playoffs? A full-go Gronk down the stretch in 2015? The Patriots might have had six Super Bowls last decade, not the three they wound up with.

In May, Gronk turned 26. In his five-year NFL career he has 61 touchdowns in 73 NFL games (including playoffs). That’s .83 TDs/Game. In 189 games, San Diego’s Antonio Gates has scored 100 touchdowns (.53 TDs/Game). Surefire Hall of Fame Tony Gonzalez? He scored 115 in 277 games (.42). If Gronk can have their longevity – a large “if” for a player who’s been cut open way too much already – he won’t be threatening their tight end records. He’ll be a threat to get into the top five all-time and will retire the belt as the best tight end in NFL history.

That’s why Gronk is here in my Top 10 and players such as Willie McGinest and Rodney Harrison with more rings and leadership are behind Gronk. They were not threats to the record books. Gronk is. And he hasn’t even been fully healthy for an entire season yet. In the 2011 playoffs, Bernard Pollard broke Gronk in the AFC Championship Game. There’s no telling the difference he would have made in the Super Bowl, but imagine Victor Cruz not playing for the Giants that day. In 2012, he broke his arm in December and then re-broke it in the playoff win over Houston. And the Patriots offense went from potent to putrid and got shut down by the Ravens in the AFC Championship.

The 2013 Patriots probably wouldn’t have won a Super Bowl even with Gronk – Seattle was that good. Denver too. But his blown ACL in December 2013 made the conversation moot. No injuries, how many rings would Gronk have added to the fingers of his teammates? Gronk’s ripple effect on the rest of the offense is significant. He is an outstanding blocker. The next-best tight end in the game, Jimmy Graham, couldn’t block an internet ad (HA!). And he attracts so much attention that the number of players defenses can allocate to wideouts is reduced. If a team wants to try and take its chances? Their chances are poor. See K.J. Wright in the Super Bowl. That’s not fair.

As far as my final criteria on this list, which is basically the extent to which a player is willing to put the team first, Gronk is interesting. Obviously, he labors as hard as any current professional athlete to cultivate his “brand” and it gets tiresome, predictable and sometimes uncomfortable, like when he supposes the president is drunk. But he serves as comic relief and – even the most skeptical among us – can’t deny that, when it’s time to play he plays. He’s the world’s friendliest, most loyal, most playful Bull Mastiff. An on-field force of nature. And he’s not even halfway done.

Gronk only burnished his on-field legend in 2015 with that otherworldly performance against the Broncos in the AFCCG. But after he mangled his back in 2016, things went awry off the field. He came back in 2017 and a push-pull between he and Bill Belichick over strength and conditioning ensued because Gronk wanted to do more of the TB12 pliability training and fewer weights. That lit the fuse on the budding Belichick-Tom Brady skirmish and the era of bad feeling entered.

Gronk kept turning in brilliant games — the dominant 2017 performance at Pittsburgh; the nine-catch, 116-yard performance against the Eagles in SB52; the work he did in the 2018 AFCCG and Super Bowl win over the Rams.

But after that 2018 season, a battered Gronk prolonged his retirement announcement and submarined the Patriots’ free agent hopes for Jared Cook. And in March 2020, after a year off, he forced his way to Tampa Bay.

Scott Zolak thought Gronk was too low for the first list.

“I look at these ‘planet players’, yellow-jacket players, Hall of Famers?” said Zo. “You look at Rob Gronkowski and his talent. He should be a helluva lot higher than no. 9. He’s the greatest tight end that’s ever played.”

But what about the end? I have that “Patriotism” part of my criteria and Gronk was, after his final game here, actively making things hard for the Patriots.

“Give him a pass on all that stuff,” said Christian Fauria. “If you want to talk about dying with a Patriots jersey on, that element, loyal to a fault? That’s (Julian) Edelman.”

It’s interesting to note that, as this list takes shape, 15 of the players I have in my still-evolving top 30 got at least a little sideways with Belichick. Some a lot more than others. But every other great player, to some degree, had a bout with Bill. That, Ted Johnson says, isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

“(Gronk) was a handful,” said the former Patriots linebacker. “He was a lot at the end. But doesn’t that tell you what Bill Belichick thought of him? Think about that: all the contract negotiations, they had. Think about the injuries that were an issue for Gronk, the parents getting involved. Is there another player that Bill would put up with all that stuff if he wasn’t the elite player he was?

“It shows you how phenomenal of a player and how impactful a player Gronk was when Bill would put up with a lot of what Gronk was doing,” he continued. “And it just tells me that Bill looks at Gronk in a whole different category. Almost like an LT. He was so good that they would put up with it. That’s what Gronk was. The kind of guy who’s in his own special category because that’s how good he was.

“Bill put up with antics and things he never would have with any other player because he knew how special a player he was. That’s how I see it. If you were to put this list together based on how it ended for some of these guys? It would be a weird list. There’s a lot of guys whose tenure didn’t end well but they still deserve to be up there.”

Fair enough. And for the record, after 2015, what were Gronk’s numbers? Fifty games, 213 catches, 3,482 yards and 25 touchdowns. In the playoffs? Another eight games, 48 catches, 636 yards and six TDs.

Continue Reading


New Book Details Kyrie Irving’s Plans To Leave Celtics, Join Kevin Durant With Nets

Irving and Durant first broached the subject of joining forces at Irving’s Weston home in January 2019 – a month before their viral All-Star Game conversation.



Photo: Shutterstock

Irving and Durant first broached the subject of joining forces at Irving’s Weston home in January 2019 – a month before their viral All-Star Game conversation.

The basketball world knew something was up when Kyrie Irving and Kevin Durant were caught talking together after the 2019 All-Star Game.

With both players set to be free agents after the 2018-19 season, the rumor mill around the two stars joining forces — with Irving breaking his promise to re-sign with the Boston Celtics — blew up.

Of course, that’s what eventually came to pass: Irving reneged on his 2018 pledge to sign long-term with the Celtics and joined Durant on the Brooklyn Nets in free agency that summer. Two years later, their team is in the hunt to compete for an NBA Finals (though Irving is currently hurt).

But a new book shows the first seeds of their future partnership were sewn before their famous All-Star Game chat.

Matt Sullivan, author of the book “Can’t Knock The Hustle,” writes that Irving and Durant first spoke about joining forces in January 2019 — a month before they met at the All-Star Game.

The two reportedly had dinner at Irving’s Weston, Massachusetts home the night before a game between Durant’s Warriors and Irving’s Celtics. During that time, the book says Irving was frustrated at his relationship with his teammates and Boston’s “misperception” of him.

“He didn’t like what his situation was,” KD later said, “and me either in Golden State. And it was just like, ‘Hey, man, let’s just see how this would work. Let’s try it out.’ And [then Los Angeles Clippers center DeAndre Jordan] wanted to play with us to be that center for us that can kinda hold it down, and play for something, really — play for a team that’s going somewhere, not just keep moving around and bouncing around to leave.”

The book also reveals Irving did have misgivings about the history of racism in Boston that he never publicly expressed — until he was about to play in front of a Boston crowd in the playoffs this year for the first time since leaving for the Nets. A friend of Irving’s reportedly said after the fact that it was “a factor” in his departure.

Additionally, the star point guard reportedly battled depression after he lost his grandfather a few weeks after his pronouncement about re-signing with Boston in 2018.

Whatever his reasons, Sullivan wrote that Irving announced his decision to join the Brooklyn Nets to a hometown friend in New Jersey in late May 2019 and officially signed a four-year, $141 million contract with his new team a month later.

After an injury-plagued first season, Irving and Durant’s Nets entered the 2021 playoffs as NBA Finals favorites. They beat the Celtics in their first-round playoff series, but not without plenty of drama surround Irving: the comments about “subtle racism” before Game 3; the stomping on the Celtics logo at the end of Game 4; and a fan throwing a water bottle at Irving shortly after.

To think all that was more than two years in the making.

Continue Reading


Red Sox Notes: Alex Cora Slaps Significant Label On Alex Verdugo

‘There’s a reason he’s hitting second’



Photo: Shutterstock

Alex Verdugo often can be overlooked as fans and media members alike fawn over the Red Sox offense.

This isn’t necessarily a slight of Verdugo. J.D. Martinez still is among the game’s best sluggers and Rafael Devers is on his way to becoming one of baseball’s most feared bats. Xander Bogaerts is, well, Xander Bogaerts.

But as Alex Cora explained after Friday’s walk-off win, Verdugo can do it all at the dish.

Verdugo’s latest thing of beauty with the bat: a game-winning knock plastered off the Green Monster that gave Boston a 6-5 victory over the Toronto Blue Jays. The heroics prompted Cora to a shine a light on the dynamic young outfielder.

“…There’s a reason he’s hitting second,” Cora said on a video conference after the game. “He’s probably the most complete hitter that we have. He can go the other way, he can hit for average, he can hit for power, he works the counts, you know? That’s the reason he’s hitting second.”

Cora continued: “…I’m very impressed for young he is, the way he controls his at-bats. He goes to the dugout and he’s upset about certain things, but then he slows it down and goes to battle. In left field today he was great. He made some good throws. He played the wall perfectly. Like I said before, this kid — he’s a good one. We got a good one. We just got to keep working with him.”

Continue Reading